Showing posts with label Yitro. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Yitro. Show all posts

Yitro - One Master

I am Hashem Your G-d, Who took you out of the land of Egypt, out of the house of bondage. You shall not have the gods of others in My presence. You shall not make for yourself a graven image or any likeness...
אָֽנֹכִ֨י ה' קלקיך אֲשֶׁ֣ר הֽוֹצֵאתִ֩יךָ֩ מֵאֶ֨רֶץ מִצְרַ֜יִם מִבֵּ֣ית עֲבָדִ֗ים
לא יִֽהְיֶ֣ה־לְךָ֩ אֱלֹהִ֨ים אֲחֵרִ֜ים עַל־פָּנַ֗י
לא תַֽעֲשֶׂה־לְּךָ֣ פֶ֣סֶל | וְכָל־תְּמוּנָ֡ה
Shmot 20:2-4

In the beginning of the Eseret HaDibarot, the Slonimer Rebbe asks some questions:
  1. Why does it start with mentioning that Hashem took us out of Egypt, and not something seemingly greater that Hashem created the world?
  2. Why does the pasuk seemingly repeat itself by saying, "out of the land of Egypt, out of the house of bondage" - isn't it implicitly understood that Egypt was the place of bondage?
  3. (the famous question) why is this first commandment written in a statement form, rather than as a command?

Two Masters
Explains the Slonimer Rebbe, it says in the Yerushalmi (Brechot 3: 3), slaves are exempt from kriat shma. For it says, "Here O Israel, Hashem is our G-d, Hashem is One", we have no other master but Hakodosh Baruch Hu. While the slave, actually has another master, the slave serves two masters.

This is the significance of the pasuk "אָֽנֹכִ֨י ה' קלקיך" that Hakadosh Baruch Hu is our G-d, our one and special master.

And that the pasuk "לא יִֽהְיֶ֣ה־לְךָ֩ אֱלֹהִ֨ים אֲחֵרִ֜ים עַל־פָּנַ֗י", this is the reality for any us. We don’t serve two masters - both our creator and our own inclination - rather we have no other master but Hakadosh Baruch Hu.

From this, the opening verse continues with "out of the land of Egypt, out of the house of bondage", that as Jews we must work on the power to overcome being drawn towards our inclinations. We’ve risen out of a ‘house of bondage’, so also  we need to pull away from the bondage of our drives and inclinations. A power was ingrained in us by Hashem when He took us out of Egypt, that he seemingly took us "out of them" into a free world.

We need to be a slave in our service to Hashem and be free from the influence of our own inclinations. Even when we stumble and even sin, we are still neither a slave unto slaves nor enslaved to that state forever, but we can always rise back up, no matter how much our inclinations pull and try to influence us.

The Eternality of Leaving Egypt
Departing Egypt is an eternal concept.
As it says in the Haggadah, had Hashem not taken us out of Egypt, then we would still be slaves in Egypt...to this day. And with this in mind, says Chazal, that everyone is obligated to see himself as if he went out of Egypt, meaning that not just our forefathers were brought out of Egypt but us as well. That had we not left Egypt we would still be slaves to slaves! Thus Hashem is not just proud of our forefathers for heeding the call and leaving Egypt, but likewise, even for us it is as if He redeemed from Egypt. Every one of us has the power to "leave Egypt" to not be a slave to "two masters" - to not be under the influence of our own inclinations.

A New Reality
This is the meaning of the opening words:
אָֽנֹכִ֨י ה' קלקיך אֲשֶׁ֣ר הֽוֹצֵאתִ֩יךָ֩ מֵאֶ֨רֶץ מִצְרַ֜יִם מִבֵּ֣ית עֲבָדִ֗ים
That from the power of “leaving Egypt” thus “I am Hashem Your G-d” - your only master. And “You shall not have the gods of others in My presence”  This is less a command and more a discovery of a new reality. After leaving Egypt, Hashem instilled in us the power to not serve two masters - serving Hashem and our inclinations.

In One Statement
We learn the pasuk could have been stated in one statement “I am Hashem Your G-d, You shall not have the gods of others” - showing that one part is dependent on the other. That if we keep the first statement then we will obviously not have other gods - that we are pure.

So it says in between, “I am Hashem Your G-d, Who took you out of the land of Egypt” just as we achieve the level of leaving Egypt, at the same time we merit a connection with Hashem.

#4 Not a Commandment
Just as “I will take you out of Egypt” was not a commandment, but more of a wake up call, not based on the people’s merit, so also FAITH is a present that Hashem gives to the Jewish people regardless - faith is etched into the foundations of being  Jew.

This is all dependent upon the second verse “not have the gods of others”, for at the very least if we don’t contaminate ourselves with other beliefs, then we preserve the faith within us.

And so the mitzvah of Faith is not like all the mitzvot. For with all the other mitzvot, they are inherently doing something, connected to an action. Faith is more about preserving a quality that we already have, and we do that by keeping the verse “not have the gods of others


In Summary
This is why the ten commandments starts with mentioning that Hashem took us out of Egypt, and not, for example, that Hashem created the world, that taking us out of Egypt established the power and foundations of our faith.
The pasuk is not repeating itself by saying, "out of the land of Egypt, out of the house of bondage" - but emphasizing two sides of this concept - taking us out of Egypt gave us an eternal power and the house of bondage represents the other side that we are striving to free ourselves from, the inclination that seeks to influence our decisions.
Finally this is not stated as a commandment, rather a statement, this is an internal feeling rather an action, a idea to continually to work on and enrich our faith.

In light of us, we are reminded of a story with the Rizhiner, the Rebbe of Rizhin.

Once a hasid came to him and said, “Rebbe,” he asked, “how is one to worship G-d without lying to oneself?”
“I’ll tell you how,” said the Rebbe, “Make believe that you’re an acrobat walking a tightrope high above. What can you do to keep your balance? Whenever your body pulls you to one side , YOU must pull to the other.”

Yitro - 6 Questions on What Yitro Really Heard

The parshah starts with:
Now Moshe's father in law, Yitro, the chieftain of Midian, heard all that G-d had done for Moshe and for Israel, His people that the Lord had taken Israel out of Egypt.
Shmot 18:1
וַיִּשְׁמַע יִתְרוֹ כֹהֵן מִדְיָן חֹתֵן מֹשֶׁה אֵת כָּל אֲשֶׁר עָשָׂה אֱ־לֹהִים לְמֹשֶׁה וּלְיִשְׂרָאֵל עַמּוֹ כִּי הוֹצִיא יְ־הֹוָ־ה אֶת יִשְׂרָאֵל מִמִּצְרָיִםשמות יח:א
A short while later another similar verse comes up.
Moshe told his father in law [about] all that the Lord had done to Pharaoh and to the Egyptians on account of Israel, [and about] all the hardships that had befallen them on the way, and [that] the Lord had saved them.
Shmot 18:8
וַיְסַפֵּר מֹשֶׁה לְחֹתְנוֹ אֵת כָּל אֲשֶׁר עָשָׂה יְ־קוָ־ק לְפַרְעֹה וּלְמִצְרַיִם עַל אוֹדֹת יִשְׂרָאֵל אֵת כָּל הַתְּלָאָה אֲשֶׁר מְצָאָתַם בַּדֶּרֶךְ וַיַּצִּלֵם יְ־קוָ־ק
שמות יח:א
Yitro Heard
The first question that comes up is, what did Yitro hear? According to Rashi:
What news did he [Yitro] hear that [made such an impression that] he came? The splitting of the Red Sea and the war with Amalek. — [from Zev. 116a, and Mechilta, combining the views of Rabbi Joshua and Rabbi Eliezer]


6 Questions
The Kli Yakar raises a number of questions around the opening verse (Shmot 18:1).

  1. Why does the latter verse occur, having Moshe explain to Yitro what happened, isn't it repeating what Yitro already heard (knew)?
  2. Why does the first verse (Shmot 18:1) refer to Moshe and Yisrael, while the latter verse (Shmot 18:8) refers to Pharaoh and the Egyptians?
  3. Why does the first verse (Shmot 18:1) use the name of G-d as Elokim (the name of divine judgement) while the latter verse (Shmot 18:8) uses the name of G-d as the YUD KAY VUV KAY (the name of divine mercy)?
  4. Why does the first verse (Shmot 18:1) refer to Moshe and Yisrael, while the latter verse (Shmot 18:9)  refers to just Yisrael
  5. Why does Yitro only declare that he is happy in the verse "Jethro was happy about all the good that the Lord had done for Israel...." (Shmot 18:9) following what Moshe told him, rather than earlier (Shmot 18:1) when Yitro 'heard' the news of what G-d had done for the Jewish people?
  6. Why does Moshe have to tell anything to Yitro (Shmot 18:8) when in the opening verses (Shmot 18:1) he knows that "...that the Lord had taken Israel out of Egypt"? 
Intro: The Power of Tzadikim and Belief in Duality
Before addressing these questions, the Kli Yakar explains that several concepts must be laid out, in order to properly address these questions. 
  1. Tzadikim have the power the to change and influence, so much so, that they can change 'din' (divine judgement) into a situation of mercy. Likewise, inherently evil individuals can perform the opposite influence, changing mercy into 'din' (divine judgement).
  2. There exists a philosophy based on the idea that there are dual forces in the world: a force that governs all that is good in the world, and a separate force that is the master of all evil in the world.
The Other Side of the Story
The Kli Yakar explains that from Yitro's point of view he had only heard about certain events, namely the splitting of the Red Sea and the victory in the war with Amalek. These were great things to attribute to Hashem, but he wasn't convinced that Hashem was the sole arbiter and power over everything in the world. Yitro still held to his belief in duality, that a power controlled the good and a separate power governed evil. It was only when Yitro had Moshe tell him, that he heard the other side of the story. 
He heard that not only did Hashem split the Red Sea for the Jews and allow them to walk across a dry sea bed, but Hashem also closed the sea together, drowning and destroying the pursuant Egyptians.
This explains questions #1, #2, #5, and #6. 

Answer to Question #1
Moshe didn't repeat things that Yitro already knew, rather he brought clarity and filled Yitro in on aspects of events he wasn't familiar with, impacting Yitro's world-view. 

Answer to Question #2
This is why in Moshe's explanation, Moshe refers to Pharaoh and the Egyptians (as opposed to Moshe and the Yisrael). Moshe is emphasizing the bad circumstances that befell  Pharaoh and the Egyptians, instigated by G-d.

Answer to Question #5
This is why Yitro declares that he is happy only AFTER he had these events explained to him by Moshe. After Moshe gives Yitro the big picture can he say with conviction that he is wholeheartedly committed to the Jewish people and to Hashem, as the sole power holding influence over the world.

Answer to Question #6
Following Moshe's clarifications, Yitro better understood what was the nature of the exodus of the Jewish People from Egypt. He saw that it wasn't just a one-sided event, totally in favor of  saving the Jewish People, but it was also an event that saw the destruction of the Egyptians. 

Measure for Measure
The Kli Yakar continues saying, even these explanations did no resolve Yitro's doubts concerning dual powers in the world, what he learned from Moshe definitely put everything into a new perspective. He now saw the amazing and good powers like splitting the sea and taking the Jewish People out of Egypt, had a contra, a spiritual opposite. He also saw that the bad and destructive events that befell the Egyptians did not operate independently. These events were in retribution, measure for measure, for the hardships that they put the Jewish People under. Everything operated in harmony. Had dual powers been at play, then Yitro would not have seen any connection between the destruction levied against the Egyptians and salvation in turn delivered to the Jewish People.

The Power of the Tzadik
Concerning the remaining questions, the Kli Yakar explains that the Tzadik has the power to change divine judgement to a situation deserving of mercy. 

Answer to Question #4
The first verse (Shmot 18:1) refers to Moshe and Yisrael in relation to the Exodus, showing that Moshe was the determining element that brought about the departure from Egypt. It was the basis of Moshe's merits that the Jewish People were able to be redeemed, for on their merit's alone they would not have been worthy. While later in the verse that Moshe explains events to Yitro (Shmot 18:8), Moshe is describing the actual departure from Egypt, not the motivating factors for allowing the Jews to leave. The Jewish People were the ones that actually left Egypt. Moshe was never in servitude.

Answer to Question #5
This also explains the use of different names for G-d. The name of divine judgement is used in the beginning, but we see that the presence of the Tzadik, Moshe, in the opening verse (Shmot 18:1) changes this to the name of mercy later (Shmot 18:8). 

The Lure of Duality 
The Kli Yakar explores further the underlying dilemma that befell Yitro. There are powerful elements and beliefs lobbying for the belief in separate and dual powers for good and evil in the world. It is a profound theological and philosophical challenge to attribute bad events to the same G-d that we pray to everyday for our sustenance and for support. For some this is a big concept to grasp.

The Kli Yakar explains how this issue is present in halachah. The Gemorrah in Mesechet Brechot says:
Come and hear: ‘In the morning, if one commenced with [the intention to say] "Who formest light" and finished with "Who bringest on the evening twilight", he has not performed his obligation; 
Brechot 12A (Soncino Edition)
For the blessings on reading the Shma, the blessing starts off with saying 'Yotzar Or' and 'Boray Hoshech' (creates the light and produces darkness). We praise Hashem for being the source of two opposite powers in the world. The ruling in halacha in clear (Shulchan Orach - Orach Haim 59:2), if just one of these phrases is used, either 'creates light' or 'produces darkness', then the blessing is incomplete, and insufficient. 

We are reminded regularly that our belief in G-d and our faith is open to tests, and even when bad things happen we still must see this as part of, and not separate from, G-d and the powers and role He plays in the world.