Behalotchah - Focused on Where we Are


Behalotchah
Once there was a tsedakah crisis. The Chasidim went to the rebbe.
"Rebbe, we need money for tzedakah, it's urgent," the Chasidim said.
The Rebbe thought for a moment, and then gave the Chassidim a fine bolt of cloth. "Here sell this in the market and you will have the money you need."
They took the cloth and thanked the Rebbe.
Then the Rebbe took the cloth back.
"Wait! There is a better way. Take this cloth and make it into a beautiful wedding dress, then you can sell it for even more money. "
They took the cloth back and thanked the rebbe, praising his wisdom and insight.
Then the Rebbe took the cloth back.
"No! Don't make the dress, take the cloth and sell it in the market and get your money now."
The Chassidim took the cloth but looked at the Rebbe confused. "Yes Rebbe, but we don't understand. Your idea to make the dress sounded so good, and a much better way to make more money. Why just sell the cloth?"
The rebbe closed his eyes and thought. Then he looked at the Chasidim and explained.
"When I gave you the cloth at first, that was my idea, to quickly help you. Then the Yetzer Horah appeared and whispered to me, saying 'make the wedding dress,' and I listened to the Yetzer Horah. Then I realized, the Yetzer Haroh was telling me to do something that we would probably would not get around to finishing. So I pushed off the Yetzer Haroh and took back the cloth. Better to make a little less money, but get it done, then get caught up in a bigger project that we would probably never finish."
Writing can be hard and the Yetzer Haroh makes it even harder, especially writing a dvar Torah. You have the Yetzer Haroh whispering in your ear:
"You're not really gonna say that?"
"That doesn't sound so profound. Do better."
"Do you really understand that well enough, maybe you need another commentary."
And so on and so on, filling the process with doubt and pushing further away from completion.
So here it goes. I'm gonna forget about making the dress here, and just go ahead and sell this bolt of fine cloth I have here.

Was it something I said?
The Discussion Between Moshe and His Father-in-law

There is a fascinating discussion between Moshe and his father-in-law in the parshah, full of suggestion and innuendo.
Then Moshe said to Hovav the son of Reuel the Midianite, Moshe's father-in-law, We are traveling to the place about which the Hashem said, I will give it to you. Come with us and we will be good to you, for the Hashem has spoken of good fortune for Israel.
 וַיֹּאמֶר מֹשֶׁה לְחֹבָב בֶּן רְעוּאֵל הַמִּדְיָנִי חֹתֵן מֹשֶׁה נֹסְעִים אֲנַחְנוּ אֶל הַמָּקוֹם אֲשֶׁר אָמַר ה אֹתוֹ אֶתֵּן לָכֶם לְכָה אִתָּנוּ וְהֵטַבְנוּ לָךְ כִּי ה` דִּבֶּר טוֹב עַל יִשְׂרָאֵל
He said to him, I won't go, for I will go to my land and my birthplace.
 וַיֹּאמֶר אֵלָיו לֹא אֵלֵךְ כִּי אִם אֶל אַרְצִי וְאֶל מוֹלַדְתִּי אֵלֵךְ
He [Moshe] said, please don't leave us, for you are familiar with our encampments in the desert and you will be our guide
 וַיֹּאמֶר אַל נָא תַּעֲזֹב אֹתָנוּ כִּי עַל כֵּן יָדַעְתָּ חֲנֹתֵנוּ בַּמִּדְבָּר וְהָיִיתָ לָּנוּ לְעֵינָיִם
 And if you go with us, then we will give you the good which G-d grants us.
וְהָיָה כִּי תֵלֵךְ עִמָּנוּ וְהָיָה הַטּוֹב הַהוּא אֲשֶׁר יֵיטִיב ה עִמָּנוּ וְהֵטַבְנוּ לָךְ
Bamidbar 10:29-32

What's going on here? Moshe turns to his father-in-law and personally invites him to travel with the Jewish People. This is Moshe, one of the greatest leaders, who communicates directly with Hashem! Moshe tells him how they are going to the very place that Hashem Himself promised them. Moshe further sweetens the offer saying that it will be good for you, and explains this Israel will also see good fortune.

This sounds great! A personal invitation by the leader of Israel, to join Israel on a divinely guided journey, with a promise of living well.
Yet how does Moshe's father-in-law respond?
He refuses! Not only does he refuse, he says that he is going back to Midian, his homeland.
What? Was it something he said?


The Nature of Language
There is a subtle difference in the words Moshe uses when inviting his father-in-law to join Israel. He describes the journey of Israel as travelling (נֹסְעִים), but when he turns to invite his father-in law, Moshe says 'Come with us (לְכָה אִתָּנוּ)' – why the subtle change in language, what is the difference, and what difference does this make?

The Kli Yakar addresses this in a fascinating explanation.

I like the commentary of the Kli Yakar. He presents things clearly, pointing out discrepancies or repetition, or the choice of words, and explains the significance in a meaningful way. The Kli Yakar was a talmid of the Maharal of Prague. From an early age he was recognized as a star orator and was renowned for his fiery drashas. In 1601, at the age of 51, he became deathly ill. During his illness he added on the name Shlomo and thereafter signed his name Shlomo Ephraim. He vowed that if he survived his illness he would compose a commentary to the Chumash. He survived, and the very next year wrote and published this commentary, and that is how we have the Kli Yakar.

Says the Kli Yakar, the language of הליכה (walking)   refers to the movement of just the feet, physically relocating a person from one place to another place (location to location).  So someone could go to a new place, and still his thoughts, and his head, are back where he came from.

While the language of  נסיעה  (travelling) this includes transporting both the physical person and his thoughts to a new place.

We saw how this different language was used earlier in Parshat Lech Lecha, when Hashem approached Avraham. Hashem said to Avraham   לך לך מארצך "Go forth from your land". What does this come to describe?

The Kli Yakar asserts that most certainly at this point, Avraham's soul is still connected to his homeland, and his father's house, even though physically he was making his way to Eretz Yisrael. In contrast, however, upon reaching Eretz Yisrael the Torah describes Avraham's travels as   הולך ונסוע הנגבה "goes and travels to the south…". Explains the Kli Yakar, in the beginning he would walk (הולך), while at the end he would travel (נוסע), this shows how, upon fully relocating to Eretz Yisrael,  Hashem had become the focus of Avraham's thoughts, replacing the nostalgia for his homeland.

It's am amazing thought, when we consider the significance of the difference between these two words. We can go places and be there in 'body' only, but our 'heads' and thoughts are so far away. This is one of the challenges of tefillah and learning, to keep our head and thoughts focused on where we actually are, not on work or family issues.

Who is  Hovav?
Moshe initially approaches his father in law in a new way, saying "Then Moshe said to Hovav".
Who is Hovav? He is referred to as Moshe's father in law. But we all know that Moshe's father in law is Yitro. So why call him Hovav?

Explains the Kli Yakar, the name, Yitro, had been hidden from the parshah. Why should the Torah hide the name of Yitro?

Says the gemarah in Yevamot (47B) in explaining how to respond to someone interested in converting to Judaism, we should challenge him, and question him. Why? 'R. Helbo said: Converts are as hard for Israel [to endure] as a sore [sfichas]…for it is written 'and the converts shall accompany them and join the House of Jacob.' (ונלווה הגר עליהם ונספחו על בית יעקב). The word "ונספחו " is interpreted according to another meaning, sfichas, which is a type of sore.

The gemarah declares here, and in several other places, that converts are a burden for Israel. Tosafot explains this passage saying that since there is a principle that all Jews are bound to one another, and that converts are not particular in Mitzvot, so we can learn from them and be influenced, and our fate as a nation will be tied to their actions. Rashi clarifies this piece, explaining that the principle of 'all of Israel is bound to one another' only refers to Jews from birth, taking the burden off of the converts.

I heard another brilliant insight to this gemarah. Why does the gemarah call the converts difficult for Israel? Rather since the converts are so enthusiastic and zealous about Mitzvot, they appear so much better then the Jews born into this, and thus 'make us look bad'.

However for this explanation, it is important to see that this gemarah is coming to explain why the name Yitro would be deliberately left out of the parshah.

It says that Yitro had 7 names. First he was Yeter, then when he converted he received a 'Vuv' becoming Yitro. Yitro comes to represent this transformation, a convert, with a name still hinting at his past. So the Torah wanted avoid any of the associations related to the issue of converts, and not connect or hint about the idea of the convert here.

That explains why not to mention Yitro, but why give a new name, why use the name Chovav?

Moshe changes the way he refers to his father-in-law, calling him Chovav.
What is Chovav? It is like the word chaviv, someone dear, to hint at what it says about Gerim - converts.

וַאֲהַבְתֶּם אֶת הַגֵּר כִּי גֵרִים הֱיִיתֶם בְּאֶרֶץ מִצְרָיִם
You shall love the stranger, for you were strangers in the land of Egypt.

Here the pasuk uses Gerim in reference to strangers, but it works back for our context, meaning that converts (גרים) should really be dear to us. That is why Moshe personally extends a direct invitation to his father in law to accompany them, to make sure he feels accepted, welcome and a full part of the Jewish People, and he emphasizes that love and compassion by addressing him as Chovav.

Understanding the Conversation
So going back and looking at the conversation between Moshe and his father-in-law we can fill in the blanks and understand the interaction that goes on much better.

Moshe says:
נֹסְעִים אֲנַחְנוּ
We are traveling

Moshe and Am Yisrael 'travel' (נסיעה) where they are going away from place they left, Egypt. It is a place that they don't have any connection to, no property or family. So they aren't nostalgic. Sure they complain, and talk about be better off having died in Egypt, but that is hardly the 'longing for the old country' we are talking about.

Rather, in talking to his father in law, Moshe says 'Halicha'  since his father in law is walking from his land, his birthplace, somewhere that he really has strong ties to. And Moshe adds his enticement 'Come with us and we will be good to you, for the Hashem has spoken of good fortune for Israel.'  (לְכָה אִתָּנוּ וְהֵטַבְנוּ לָךְ כִּי ה` דִּבֶּר טוֹב עַל יִשְׂרָאֵל). This shows Moshe's sensitivity and how he understands that it is not so easy to leave your homeland, especially from a place where you are set financially and socially.

Moreover, Hashem commanded us to be good to those that connected with us, that joined the fate of the Jewish People. And we go back to the verse the verse we mentioned earlier from Yevamot "and the strangers shall accompany them and join the House of Jacob" (Yeshayahu 14:1) ונלווה הגר עליהם ונספחו על בית יעקב.

But now we interpret the word 'ונספחו' in the literal sense - to join on to - emphasizing absorption, and going out of one's way to make sure to include the Gerim (converts) with the people of Israel.

But he responds to Moshe saying:
וַיֹּאמֶר אֵלָיו לֹא אֵלֵך
He said to him, I won't go

Why did he refuse Moshe's direct invitation?

Yitro was angry that Moshe referred to him with the language of 'הליכה', which seemed to suggest suspicion that Yitro's thoughts were still firmly based in his homeland, despite being physically with the Jewish People. This suggestion was especially difficult, and came across as insensitive.  For the Torah was so dear to Yitro, that he removed anything else from his thoughts, even his homeland, desiring for an all out connection with the 'shechinah' the presence of Hashem.

He continues his response to Moshe,  saying:
כִּי אִם אֶל אַרְצִי וְאֶל מוֹלַדְתִּי אֵלֵךְ
 for I will go to my land and my birthplace.

This is not a criticism back to Moshe, rather Yitro says 'הליכה' to say: I will walk to my birthplace and convert my family, otherwise my thoughts will always be clouded by them, in this holy place that my soul connects to. Yitro is not nostalgic or longs for the old country, rather he feels for his family and wants them to join the amazing experience he has been granted.

Moshe replies back, seemingly concerned, saying:
וַיֹּאמֶר אַל נָא תַּעֲזֹב אֹתָנוּ
He said, Please don't leave us,

Now Moshe understands Yitro, and how he may have insulted Yitro. Moshe says apologetically, I never had any doubts that you would go back to your home, and abandon this high level of holiness you have reached. Rather I was concerned that you would see this people (Israel), and see that they are a difficult people, how they show resentment, argue, and complain. Maybe out of this you would not want to stick with us.

And Moshe adds, showing more concern of the impression he makes on Yitro:
תֵלֵךְ עִמָּנוּ
if you go with us

And not with these complainers, and resenters. Thus I request, don't abandon us, because from you the entire population gains merit, and all eyes in Israel will look to you to learn from you, since you abandoned your homeland and came to bond with the shechinah, so all the more so Israel should follow.
Yitro serves as a tremendous inspiration for the Jewish People, and that is why Moshe says to him:

וְהָיִיתָ לָּנוּ לְעֵינָיִם
and you will be our guide

In Conclusion
We are all going many places in life. Travelling, walking (Nisiah and Halichah)
Bezrat hashem we should find ourselves going by  Nisiah, with our body and thoughts in focus, and not in Halicha.

Shavuot - What is the connection of Ruth to Shavuot


Referred to as Japan's Thomas Edison, Sakichi Toyoda invented a variety of weaving machines, including an automatic power loom, and founded Toyoda Automatic Loom.

Sakichi Toyoda grew up in the late 1800's in a remote farming community outside of Nagoya, Japan. As a boy, Sakichi Toyoda watched his mother and grandmother weaving cloth by hand. He was disturbed that his mother, grandmother, and their friends had to work so hard spinning and weaving. The weaving process required them to thread the material through the weaving machine, a long and tiring process. One of the problems they faced was when a thread broke, it unwound through the entire machine, and the women would have to start all over again and rethread – an extremely time consuming process - before continuing to weave.

Learning carpentry from his father, Toyoda eventually applied that skill to designing and building wooden spinning machines. In 1894 he began to make manual looms that were cheaper but worked better than existing looms.

He invented a series of weaving machines which speeded up the process enormously. Among his inventions was a feature that was a special mechanism to automatically stop a loom whenever a thread broke, catching the thread before it unwound completely, relieving the operator of the punishing labor of having to rethread the machine.

Eventually, Toyoda went on to found a car manufacturing company, and the name of the company was changed from Toyoda to Toyota, preferring the fewer brushstrokes required to write the 't' in Toyota.
This invention impressed me as an 'mashal' for something we can apply to our lives. When we create a mechanism in our life our own automatic stop mechanism, it can be used to hold us in check. This mechanism can be contact with a friend, a regular shiur, a relationship with your rabbi. These experiences not only can keep us on a straight path but create a platform for continued growth.

On Shavuot, there is the custom to read Megilat Ruth
·        Question #1: Who wrote Megilat Ruth?
·        Question #2: Why was Megilat Ruth written?
·        Question #3: What need did Shmuel see in writing this book?
·        Question #4: Why include the book of Ruth in the canon of the 24 books of the Tanach?
·        Question #5: What is the connection of Ruth to 'Atzeret' (Shavuot?

Kedushat Levi on Why we Read Ruth on Shavuot

Reb Levi Yitzhak of Berditchev, the great advocate of Israel, was known for putting his love of G-d high, and calling Israel, His children, saying that the Torah is the soul of Israel. A story that I saw about Reb Levi went:

On Simchat Torah, Reb Levi Yitzhak was given the honor of leading the first round of dancing. He went up to the bima and put on a tallis, then he took it off, then he put it on, then he took it off. As if talking to the air, he said, "If you are such a scholar and pray so well, then you lead the dancing!" and he stepped off the bima and left.

Later at dinner, his father in law said, "Tonight you embarrassed me tremendously, can you explain?"
"Yes I will explain. When I went up to the bima, I put on the tallis and I saw the Yetzer Hara. 'You,' I said. 'Yes,' he said, 'surprised? Why are you so worthy to be here?'
'Yes,' I told him, 'I am learned.'
'So am I,' he said.
'I learn with a great teacher, the great Maggid from Mezrich.'
'So do I.'
'How can you?'
'I am with all the time, when you go to the beit midrash, I go with you, when you go to see your Rebbe, I go with. I am with you all the time.'
'If that's so, if you are such a scholar and pray so well, then you lead the dancing!' and that's why I left.
Reb Levi Yitzhak was passionate and a holy man of integrity. His seminal work is the Kedushat Levi.

The Kedushat Levi explains the reason that on Shavuot we read the Book of Ruth by bringing the Holy Zohar, focusing on the verse:
"He [Moshe] said: HaShem came from Sinai and shone forth from Seir to them; He appeared from Mount Paran and came with some of the holy myriads; from His right hand was a fiery Law for them"
וַיֹּאמַר: ה` מִסִּינַי בָּא וְזָרַח מִשֵּׂעִיר לָמוֹ הוֹפִיעַ מֵהַר פָּארָן וְאָתָה מֵרִבְבֹת קֹדֶשׁ מִימִינוֹ [אשדת] אֵשׁ דָּת לָמוֹ
Devarim 33:2

Rashi comments:
·        and shone forth from Seir to them: [Why did He come from Seir?] Because HaShem first offered the children of Esau [who dwelled in Seir] that they accept the Torah, but they did not want [to accept it].
·        from Mount Paran: [Why did G-d then come from Paran?] Because He went there and offered the children of Ishmael [who dwelled in Paran] to accept the Torah, but they [also] did not want [to accept it]. Avodah Zara 2B

Continues the Kedushat Levi from the Zohar: first Hashem came to Esau to present the Torah, and Esau said that he didn't want it and said that this should be given to Israel. To further substantiate this position, Esau also admitted that the firstborn birthright rightfully belonged to Israel and gave a present to Israel, in that Israel should get the Torah.

Likewise Yishmael didn't want to receive the Torah and said that it should be given to Israel. Also to boost this position, Yishmael admitted that he is not the true heir to Avraham  that only Yitzhak is the true 'zerah Avraham,' the legitimate heir to Avraham and also gave a present to Israel.

Nations of the World Praise Israel

How could these two nations, so traditionally at odds with Israel, praise Israel? This helps to explain passage from the Gemarah, in Mesechet Zvachim 116A,
For when the Torah was given to Israel the sound travelled from one end of the earth to the other, and all the heathen kings were seized with trembling in their palaces, and they uttered song.
They were afraid that Hashem had launched another cataclysmic flood, or other world apocalypse. Then they understood that the sound was the giving of the Torah at Har Sinar, they knew that He desired to give the Torah to His children, as it is said, "The L-rd shall grant strength to His people."(Tehillim 29:11. — The Torah is the strength of Israel.) Then the nations all exclaimed:

 "the L-rd shall bless His people with peace."
ה' עוז לעמו יתן ה' יברך את עמו בשלום
Tehillim 29:11

Why were the nations of the world praising Israel? Because they heard that Israel is actually receiving the Torah, and the Holy One, blessed be He won't come back to them to present the Torah to them again.

Giving Presents to Israel?

What were the presents mentioned that the nations of the world gave to Israel? In order to ensure that Israel would get the Torah, they gave presents to Israel. What were these presents? They were the holy souls that were imprisoned amongst the nations. They were returned to Israel and converted. These are the presents that were given by the nations to Israel, holy souls like Ruth.

Greatness of Ruth

Ruth was a great soul, that out of her will come the Moshiach. This is one of the souls that the nations gave to us, so that we would get the Torah, as well as many other holy souls. The main soul is Ruth since from her will come the Moshiach. That is why we read the Book of Ruth on Shavuot, the day that we receive the Torah, the day that we commemorate standing at Har Sinai. This serves as a reminder to us, how when the other nations refused the Torah, we were given the Torah, and how her soul was set free from its place amongst the nations in order for the  Torah to be given on Har Sinai to Israel on this day.

Why Read the Book of Ruth

In the book of Ruth, the author is not mentioned. Who is the author of Megilat Ruth? According to tradition, Shmuel HaNavi is the author of the Book of Ruth.
To understand how Ruth is connected to Shavuot, we have to go back and see how the treatment of Ruth.

Was Ruth a Kosher Convert? Allusions in Megilat Ruth

We see in the Gemarah that in the days of the Judges (Shofetim) in the generation of Boaz, there was a dispute, there was doubt about the lineage of David's family – whether they were kosher to be accepted into the Jewish people.  Allusions to the controversy surrounding the legitimacy of accepting Ruth into the Jewish people comes up in Megilat Ruth.

Boaz went to the gate of the city and waited for his relative, the brother of Elimelech, Naomi's dead husband. When the relative came, referred to only as "Ploni Almoni", Boaz brought him in. Boaz also gathered ten elders.

"Naomi is selling the property of our relative Elimelech, who died. As his brother, you are the closest relative. Will you to redeem (purchase) it? If not, I am the next eligible relative."
"I'll take it," Ploni responded.

Boaz continued. "The one who buys this property must also agree to marry Ruth. Will you?"
And the close relative said, "I cannot redeem [it] for myself, lest I mar my heritage. You redeem my redemption for yourself for I cannot redeem [it]."
ויאמר הגאל לא אוכל לגאול [לגאל] לי פן אשחית את נחלתי גאל לך אתה את גאלתי כי לא אוכל לגאל
Ruth 4:6
Rashi explains the word  'heritage' (נחלה)  according to the pasuk in Tehilim (127:3) "Behold, the heritage of the Lord is sons" (הנה נחלת ה` בנים שכר פרי הבטן). This shows how even here there was concern that Ruth was forbidden to join the community of Israel. He would not be ready to marry Ruth, and risk the impact to his descendents, barring them from remaining with the Jewish people.

Shmuel Bar Nachmani says in the Yalkut Shimoni that the anonymous relative is 'ignorant' of true Divrei Torah, as the relative says 'I will go and take her for me and bring a disqualification on my children?' For he was not aware that the halachah had been renewed in respect to 'Amoni and not Amonite, Moabi and not Moabite.'

וימר סורה שבה פה פלוני אלמוני, אר"ש בר נחמני אלם היה בדברי תורה שאמר ראשונים לא מתו אלא בשביל שנטלו אותה אני אלך ואטלה לי שאני מערב פסול בבני, ולא היה ידוע שכבר נתחדשה הלכה עמוני ולא עמונית מואבי ולא מואבית
Yalkut Shimoni Ruth Chapter 4
What was the source of doubt? What ignited the dispute?

Since David's family was descended from Ruth the Moabite, as it is written in Megilat Ruth. Yet we have an explicit pasuk saying that we don't accept anyone from Moab as a convert:

An Ammonite or Moabite shall not enter the assembly of the Lord; even the tenth generation shall never enter the assembly of the Lord.
לֹא יָבֹא עַמּוֹנִי וּמוֹאָבִי בִּקְהַל יְ־הֹוָ־ה גַּם דּוֹר עֲשִׂירִי לֹא יָבֹא לָהֶם בִּקְהַל ה` עַד עוֹלָם
Dvarim 23:4
It would seem that Ruth's conversion would not be valid and she should not brought  into the Jewish people. That was the basis for the questions surrounding the suitability of David's family.

Disputed Lineage of David

The controversy surrounding the suitability of David takes place in Gemarah Yevamot (76B), describing how this was questioned in the time of Shaul HaMelech.
And when Shaul saw David going out toward the Philistine, he said to Abner, the general of his army, "Whose son is this youth, Abner?" And Abner said, "By your life, O King, I know not."
Shmuel A 17:55

The Gemarah is surprised by Shaul's question about David, as if he doesn't know who David is, considering the earlier pasuk:
And David came to Saul, and stood before him, and he loved him very much, and he was his weapon bearer.
ויאהבהו מאוד, ויהי לו נושא כלים
Shmuel A 16:21

Rather the gemarah suggests he made the inquiry concerning the father of David, as it says:
And when Shaul saw David going out toward the Philistine, he said to Abner, the general of his army, "Whose son is this youth, Abner?" And Abner said, "By your life, O King, I know not. And the king said, "You ask whose son this youth is."
וְכִרְאוֹת שָׁאוּל אֶת דָּוִד יֹצֵא לִקְרַאת הַפְּלִשְׁתִּי, אָמַר אֶל אַבְנֵר שַׂר הַצָּבָא: בֶּן מִי זֶה הַנַּעַר, אַבְנֵר? וַיֹּאמֶר אַבְנֵר: חֵי נַפְשְׁךָ, הַמֶּלֶך, אִם יָדָעְתִּי. וַיֹּאמֶר הַמֶּלֶךְשְׁאַל אַתָּה, בֶּן מִי זֶה הָעָלֶם
Shmuel A 17:55-56

The gemarah is also surprised by this inquiry, for Shaul was already familiar with David's father, Yishai. Yishai was one of the king's servents, as it says:
The son of your bondsman, Yishai the Bethlehemite.
בן עבדך ישי בית הלחמי
Shmuel A 17:58

To understand Shaul's concern we have to look inward to Shaul see his circumstance. In those days, Shaul was facing tremendous insecurity, feeling like his kingship was threatened and he was losing his hold. He saw that David acted and behaved with royal attributes, putting fear into the heart of Shaul, asking himself that perhaps in the future he will take the kingship from him as Shmuel had said.

Following the episode at Gilgal, where Shaul didn't wait for Shmuel HaNavi and on his own accord prepared an offering, Shmuel came can criticized Shaul.
And Shmuel said to Saul, "You have done foolishly; you have not observed the commandment of the L-rd your G-d, which He commanded you, for now, the L-rd would have established your kingdom over Israel forever. But now, your kingdom shall not continue; the L-rd has sought for Himself a man after His heart, and the L-rd has appointed him to be a ruler over His people, for you have not kept that which the L-rd commanded you."
Shmuel A 13:13-14

So when Shaul asks, "Whose son is this" he is not asking about the father but about the lineage.
Shaul is asking whether David was descended from Perez, or from Zerah.  If he was descended from Perez, then David would be king, for a king breaks for himself a way and no one can hinder him. Peraz was the line with kingly qualities. If, however, he is descended from Zerah he would only be an important man.

Questioning David's Suitability

Doeg, a leader in the Sanhedrin, then said to Shaul, 'Instead of enquiring whether he is fit to be king or not, enquire rather whether he is permitted to enter the assembly or not'!
'Because he is descended from Ruth the Moabite.'
Said Abner to him, "An Ammonite or Moabite shall not enter the assembly of the Lord;" and 'We learned: An Ammonite, but not an Ammonitess; A Moabite, but not a Moabitess!   There was no intention by the Torah to entire nations of Moav and Ammon, rather just the males.
Doeg answered back, 'in that case if we are to take this level of scrutiny, then we should apply this principle to other cases of those not permitted to enter the assembly of Israel, like a mamzer would imply: But not a female bastard? — It is written mamzer [Which implies] anyone objectionable.  And also for an Egyptian, this would exclude the Egyptian woman?'
Avner answered back 'Here it is different, since the reason for the prohibition is that the Torah explicitly stated: "Because they did not greet you with bread and water on the way, when you left Egypt"(Dvarim 23:5). Who was expected to come with bread and water, just the men, not the women, so was the custom for a man to meet travelers, while not the custom for a woman to meet them. While for the other cases, mamzer and Egyptian, the Torah did not attribute any explicit verse to keeping them out, making that prohibition all inclusive.
Doeg responds, the men should have met the men and the women the women! And this would have made the women of Moav unacceptable as well!
Avner was silent.
Doeg's question remained, throwing doubt on the suitability of David to enter the community of Israel.
Here the King said, "Whose son are you, young man (עלם)?" And the gemarah focuses on how Shaul changes his language in how he refers to David.   Previously he calls David a youth (נער). Why the change in language? This was an effort by Shaul to hint to Doeg that he is wrong. The gemarrah explains the word according עלם according to the meaning 'overlook', saying  'You have overlooked  a halachah,' go and enquire at the beit medrash!'
Doeg went to the Beit Midrash and upon enquiry, he was told the interpretation of the verse as: An Ammonite but not an Ammonitess; a Moabite, but not a Moabitess.
Doeg presented to the Beit Midrash all the objections he brought to Avner, yet the Beit Midrash eventually remained silent. So Doeg wanted to make a public announcement against him the suitability of having a king from David, as a descendent of Ruth the Moabitess.
Now Amasa girded on his sword like an Ishmaelite and exclaimed, 'Whoever will not obey the following halachah will be stabbed with the sword; I have this tradition from the Beth din of Shmuel: An Ammonite but not an Ammonitess; A Moabite, but not a Moabitess'!

Answers

·        Why did Shmuel see it necessary to write Megilat Ruth?
·        Why is Ruth included in the canon of the bible?
·        What is the connection of Ruth to 'Atzeret' (Shavuot?

R' Shlomo Alkabetz:  Legitimize David

Shmuel saw that the halachah for 'Amoni and not Amonite, Moabi and not Moabite' was becoming unstable among the Jewish people, facing disregard, raising issues about the legitimacy of David, so Shmuel wanted to strengthen and publicize this halachah. Perhaps Shmuel even felt that he was obligated to do this since by his own very hands David was anointed King over Israel. And so was motivated to write Megilat Ruth to provide strength  to this act, and to establish and publicize the legitimacy of the David's lineage – 'al pi din'.

R' Shlomo Alkabetz wanted bring attention to this approach about the purpose of Megilat Ruth, in his essay 'Shoresh Yishai' – Root of Yishai. In his commentary of R' Shlomo Alkabetz, author of the Lecha Dodi and a contemporary of Rav Yosef Karo, the Mchaber, writes on Megilat Ruth, "Megilat Ruth was written to legitimize David and to teach that it is acceptable to bring a Moabite into the community of Israel. And this is the ruling of Shmuel, to remove the questions surrounding the anointment of David."
This also answers our other questions of why we read Megillat Ruth on Shavuot, and why Megillat Ruth is included in the Tanach.

Since Shavuot celebrates receiving the Torah, and we are commanded to believe that all the Torah that is in our hands today was given to Moshe on Har Sinai, the Written Torah and the Oral Torah, that they both came down to us bound as one.

Ruth and the Oral Torah

So as to remove from the hearts of the doubters of the authenticity of The Oral Torah, like Sadduckim and other groups, Chazal saw a need to establish the custom of reading Megilat Ruth on Shavuot, since it comes to strengthen the validity of The Oral Torah. How?

In Megilat Ruth, it relates how Boaz was a Judge and a gadol HaDor, he went out and risked his reputation and took Ruth the Moabitess for himself to be his wife in front of the elders, despite that this may appear to be a blatant violation of a written verse, "An Ammonite or Moabite shall not enter the assembly of the Lord." Anyone reading the megilah may ask themselves, how could Boaz transgress an explicit verse from the Torah? And to add to this shock, one could ask how could Moshiach Ben David come out from a Moabite, unfit to join Israel?

We are compelled to accept the halachah and interpret the verse as "Moabi and not Moabite" and to come to accept that together Moshe received the Written Torah and the Oral Torah, which includes halachot and interpretations. One of those interpretations is "Moabi and not Moabite."

Kings and Ruth

Why did it have to come about that in spite of it all Jewish Kingship is descended from a Moabite? This is because our kings are commanded that Torah should go out and come in with them.
And it will be, when he sits upon his royal throne, that he shall write for himself two copies of this Torah on a scroll from [that Torah which is] before the kohanim of Levy. And it shall be with him, and he shall read it all the days of his life, so that he may learn to fear the Lord, his G-d, to keep all the words of this Torah and these statutes, to perform them,
Dvarim 17:18-19

So that  it should enter the heart of the king to embrace only the written Torah and abandon the Oral Torah. Hashem turned about circumstances so that kings of Israel were descended from Ruth the Moabite, that she is the guarantee that holds the kings for all time bound to the Oral Torah, that if they should neglect the Oral Torah, then they can raise questions about the own legitimacy to rule.

Explaining the Essence of Ruth

The midrash asks, why was Megillat Ruth written?
 R. Zeirah said: "This scroll contains neither laws of purity or impurity, neither what is permitted or forbidden. Why was it written? Answers the midrash, to teach us how much of a reward is granted for Gemilut Hasidim (Acts of Kindness).

These are the actions of Ruth, she displays acts of kindness that go against the inherent nature of man. This is an elevated level of Chesed, when a daughter in law connects so tightly with her mother in law. The Alshich HaKadosh adds to this in his commentary on Ruth, Ene Moshe (The Eyes of Moshe). R' Moshe Alshich (also spelled Alshech), was a prominent rabbi, preacher, and biblical commentator in the latter part of the 16th century. He moved to Safed where he became a student of Rabbi Joseph Caro.

He writes: this is a characteristic that is contrary to nature "since all daughter's in law despise their mother in law" and despite this Ruth connected with Naomi.  And it is possible to say that her actions were a fix – a tikun – for the sins of her forefathers, whose behavior showed ingratitude towards the kindness of Avraham.
What was the 'chesed' of Avraham showed to Ruth's forefathers? In the war of 4 kings and 5 kings, Lot, Avraham's nephew was taken captive.

And Abram heard that his kinsman had been taken captive, and he armed his trained men, those born in his house, three hundred and eighteen, and he pursued [them] until Dan. And he divided himself against them at night, he and his servants, and smote them, and pursued them until Hobah, which is to the left of Damascus. And he restored all the possessions, and also Lot his brother and his possessions he restored, and also the women and the people.
Breisheit 14:14-16

Avraham helped the entire family of Lot, who would become the progenitor of the families of Amon and Moab.
And Lot's two daughters conceived from their father.  And the elder bore a son, and she named him Moab; he is the father of Moab until this day. And the younger, she too bore a son, and she named him Ben-ami; he is the father of the children of Ammon until this day.
Breisheit 19:36-38

Yet despite this history and legacy of kindness shown to the nations of Moab and Ammon. They did not show kindness in return when the Jewish people were in despair.
An Ammonite or Moabite shall not enter the assembly of the Lord; even the tenth generation shall never enter the assembly of the Lord. Because they did not greet you with bread and water on the way, when you left Egypt, and because he [the people of Moab] hired Balaam the son of Beor from Pethor in Aram Naharaim against you, to curse you.
Dvarim 23:4-5

That in despite all of these factors, Ruth strived to show kindness, making her chesed is even greater. From he we can take away from the Book of Ruth, not only a renewed commitment to the entirety of Torah both the written and the oral and all the interpretations, but also the essential message of striving to do good, be kind, and overcome a natural inclination to do otherwise.
  

Yitro - 6 Questions on What Yitro Really Heard

The parshah starts with:
Now Moshe's father in law, Yitro, the chieftain of Midian, heard all that G-d had done for Moshe and for Israel, His people that the Lord had taken Israel out of Egypt.
Shmot 18:1
וַיִּשְׁמַע יִתְרוֹ כֹהֵן מִדְיָן חֹתֵן מֹשֶׁה אֵת כָּל אֲשֶׁר עָשָׂה אֱ־לֹהִים לְמֹשֶׁה וּלְיִשְׂרָאֵל עַמּוֹ כִּי הוֹצִיא יְ־הֹוָ־ה אֶת יִשְׂרָאֵל מִמִּצְרָיִםשמות יח:א
A short while later another similar verse comes up.
Moshe told his father in law [about] all that the Lord had done to Pharaoh and to the Egyptians on account of Israel, [and about] all the hardships that had befallen them on the way, and [that] the Lord had saved them.
Shmot 18:8
וַיְסַפֵּר מֹשֶׁה לְחֹתְנוֹ אֵת כָּל אֲשֶׁר עָשָׂה יְ־קוָ־ק לְפַרְעֹה וּלְמִצְרַיִם עַל אוֹדֹת יִשְׂרָאֵל אֵת כָּל הַתְּלָאָה אֲשֶׁר מְצָאָתַם בַּדֶּרֶךְ וַיַּצִּלֵם יְ־קוָ־ק
שמות יח:א
Yitro Heard
The first question that comes up is, what did Yitro hear? According to Rashi:
What news did he [Yitro] hear that [made such an impression that] he came? The splitting of the Red Sea and the war with Amalek. — [from Zev. 116a, and Mechilta, combining the views of Rabbi Joshua and Rabbi Eliezer]


6 Questions
The Kli Yakar raises a number of questions around the opening verse (Shmot 18:1).

  1. Why does the latter verse occur, having Moshe explain to Yitro what happened, isn't it repeating what Yitro already heard (knew)?
  2. Why does the first verse (Shmot 18:1) refer to Moshe and Yisrael, while the latter verse (Shmot 18:8) refers to Pharaoh and the Egyptians?
  3. Why does the first verse (Shmot 18:1) use the name of G-d as Elokim (the name of divine judgement) while the latter verse (Shmot 18:8) uses the name of G-d as the YUD KAY VUV KAY (the name of divine mercy)?
  4. Why does the first verse (Shmot 18:1) refer to Moshe and Yisrael, while the latter verse (Shmot 18:9)  refers to just Yisrael
  5. Why does Yitro only declare that he is happy in the verse "Jethro was happy about all the good that the Lord had done for Israel...." (Shmot 18:9) following what Moshe told him, rather than earlier (Shmot 18:1) when Yitro 'heard' the news of what G-d had done for the Jewish people?
  6. Why does Moshe have to tell anything to Yitro (Shmot 18:8) when in the opening verses (Shmot 18:1) he knows that "...that the Lord had taken Israel out of Egypt"? 
Intro: The Power of Tzadikim and Belief in Duality
Before addressing these questions, the Kli Yakar explains that several concepts must be laid out, in order to properly address these questions. 
  1. Tzadikim have the power the to change and influence, so much so, that they can change 'din' (divine judgement) into a situation of mercy. Likewise, inherently evil individuals can perform the opposite influence, changing mercy into 'din' (divine judgement).
  2. There exists a philosophy based on the idea that there are dual forces in the world: a force that governs all that is good in the world, and a separate force that is the master of all evil in the world.
The Other Side of the Story
The Kli Yakar explains that from Yitro's point of view he had only heard about certain events, namely the splitting of the Red Sea and the victory in the war with Amalek. These were great things to attribute to Hashem, but he wasn't convinced that Hashem was the sole arbiter and power over everything in the world. Yitro still held to his belief in duality, that a power controlled the good and a separate power governed evil. It was only when Yitro had Moshe tell him, that he heard the other side of the story. 
He heard that not only did Hashem split the Red Sea for the Jews and allow them to walk across a dry sea bed, but Hashem also closed the sea together, drowning and destroying the pursuant Egyptians.
This explains questions #1, #2, #5, and #6. 

Answer to Question #1
Moshe didn't repeat things that Yitro already knew, rather he brought clarity and filled Yitro in on aspects of events he wasn't familiar with, impacting Yitro's world-view. 

Answer to Question #2
This is why in Moshe's explanation, Moshe refers to Pharaoh and the Egyptians (as opposed to Moshe and the Yisrael). Moshe is emphasizing the bad circumstances that befell  Pharaoh and the Egyptians, instigated by G-d.

Answer to Question #5
This is why Yitro declares that he is happy only AFTER he had these events explained to him by Moshe. After Moshe gives Yitro the big picture can he say with conviction that he is wholeheartedly committed to the Jewish people and to Hashem, as the sole power holding influence over the world.

Answer to Question #6
Following Moshe's clarifications, Yitro better understood what was the nature of the exodus of the Jewish People from Egypt. He saw that it wasn't just a one-sided event, totally in favor of  saving the Jewish People, but it was also an event that saw the destruction of the Egyptians. 

Measure for Measure
The Kli Yakar continues saying, even these explanations did no resolve Yitro's doubts concerning dual powers in the world, what he learned from Moshe definitely put everything into a new perspective. He now saw the amazing and good powers like splitting the sea and taking the Jewish People out of Egypt, had a contra, a spiritual opposite. He also saw that the bad and destructive events that befell the Egyptians did not operate independently. These events were in retribution, measure for measure, for the hardships that they put the Jewish People under. Everything operated in harmony. Had dual powers been at play, then Yitro would not have seen any connection between the destruction levied against the Egyptians and salvation in turn delivered to the Jewish People.

The Power of the Tzadik
Concerning the remaining questions, the Kli Yakar explains that the Tzadik has the power to change divine judgement to a situation deserving of mercy. 

Answer to Question #4
The first verse (Shmot 18:1) refers to Moshe and Yisrael in relation to the Exodus, showing that Moshe was the determining element that brought about the departure from Egypt. It was the basis of Moshe's merits that the Jewish People were able to be redeemed, for on their merit's alone they would not have been worthy. While later in the verse that Moshe explains events to Yitro (Shmot 18:8), Moshe is describing the actual departure from Egypt, not the motivating factors for allowing the Jews to leave. The Jewish People were the ones that actually left Egypt. Moshe was never in servitude.

Answer to Question #5
This also explains the use of different names for G-d. The name of divine judgement is used in the beginning, but we see that the presence of the Tzadik, Moshe, in the opening verse (Shmot 18:1) changes this to the name of mercy later (Shmot 18:8). 

The Lure of Duality 
The Kli Yakar explores further the underlying dilemma that befell Yitro. There are powerful elements and beliefs lobbying for the belief in separate and dual powers for good and evil in the world. It is a profound theological and philosophical challenge to attribute bad events to the same G-d that we pray to everyday for our sustenance and for support. For some this is a big concept to grasp.

The Kli Yakar explains how this issue is present in halachah. The Gemorrah in Mesechet Brechot says:
Come and hear: ‘In the morning, if one commenced with [the intention to say] "Who formest light" and finished with "Who bringest on the evening twilight", he has not performed his obligation; 
Brechot 12A (Soncino Edition)
For the blessings on reading the Shma, the blessing starts off with saying 'Yotzar Or' and 'Boray Hoshech' (creates the light and produces darkness). We praise Hashem for being the source of two opposite powers in the world. The ruling in halacha in clear (Shulchan Orach - Orach Haim 59:2), if just one of these phrases is used, either 'creates light' or 'produces darkness', then the blessing is incomplete, and insufficient. 

We are reminded regularly that our belief in G-d and our faith is open to tests, and even when bad things happen we still must see this as part of, and not separate from, G-d and the powers and role He plays in the world.


Bo - Looking Up

When Hashem explains to Moshe and Aharon about the 10th plague, he tells them to convey to the Jewish people the proper way to be prepared for this plague.
And they shall take [some] of the blood and put it on the TWO DOORPOSTS and ON THE LINTEL, on the houses in which they will eat it.
Shmot 12:7
Yet when Moshe calls the elders together to actually explain to them what Hashem had told him. Moshe says this over slightly different.
And you shall take a bunch of hyssop and immerse [it] in the blood that is in the basin, and you shall extend TO THE LINTEL and TO THE TWO DOORPOSTS the blood that is in the basin, and you shall not go out, any man from the entrance of his house until morning.
Shmot 12:22
In presenting the instructions for the Jewish people to carry out, Moshe changes the order for how the blood should be applied to the doorway.

Order
Says the Baal HaTurim in regards to the change of order from the earlier verse to Moshe's version, he explains this as showing that the order really doesn't matter. No matter which order you put the blood on the doorway, you will have fulfilled your obligation.

Symbol of the Doorway
Says the Kli Yakar, by way of Midrash, we can see the deeper meaning in all the elements of the doorway. As the midrash Eicha Rabbah relates, this is like HaKodesh Baruch Hu appealing to the Jewish people.
From the days of your fathers you have departed from My laws and have not kept [them]. "Return to Me, and I will return to you," said the Lord of Hosts, but you said, "With what have we to return?"
Malachi 3:7
And the midrash continues, saying, "...rather You should return first." The midrash rests upon the following verse:
Restore us to You, O Lord, that we may be restored! Renew our days as of old.
Eicha 5:21
The Kli Yakar establishes that from the point of view of the Jewish people, Hashem provides the power and strength to change our ways, and come back to him.

The Lintel
Based on this interpretation, the Lintel, the singular element in the doorway, serves to represent Hashem, positioned across the top. This is found the following verses.
For He has looked down from His holy HEIGHT; the Lord LOOKED FROM HEAVEN to earth,
Tehillim 102:20
The Doorposts
The two doorposts literally support the lintel, across the top. The lintel symbolizes Hashem looking down, so who supports Hashem? The merit of the Patriarchs and Matriarchs. We see this in the verse:
which are the abode for the God Who precedes all, and BELOW ARE THE MIGHTY ONES OF THE WORLD. He expelled the enemy from before you, and said, 'Destroy!'
Dvarim 33:27
Who are the mighty ones of the world, who is deserving of this accolade? The Patriarchs are part of the infrastructure that form the foundations for Judaism, and our relationship with Hashem. That is why when Hashem gives over the instructions to Moshe, He imparts honor to the Patriarchs and lists The Doorposts before the Lintel. That is to say that righteous ones, they are the Patriarchs and the Matriarchs.

The Source of Power
However Moshe changed the order. Why? This goes along with what the verse says in Malachi. At this stage of the Exodus, the Jewish people are at their weakest - spiritually and physically. Moshe turns his pleas heavenwards, engaging Hashem to impart strength to the Jewish people.

The Divine Relationship
Continues the Kli Yakar, saying, this helps to explain the Rashi in Shir HaShirim.
How fair are your feet in sandals, O daughter of nobles! The curves of your thighs are like jewels, the handiwork of a CRAFTSMAN.
Shir HaShirim 7:2
Says Rashi on the word "craftsman":
The Hebrew word for "craftsman" is "אוּמָן"  which is like the word "אֳמָן". We say the word  "אֳמָן" in order to show praise of the Holy One, blessed be He, the Israelites praise Him from TOP to BOTTOM. They commence, so to speak, from “His head is as finest gold,” and progressively descend to “His legs are as pillars of marble,” since they come to appease Him, to draw DOWN His Shechinah from the HEAVENLY ABODES to the EARTHLY ABODES. He, however, counts their praises from BOTTOM to TOP: “How fair are your feet!” and He progressively counts until, “Your head upon you is like Carmel,” until He comes to draw them to Him.
 The Jewish people  relate to Hashem from the heights down to our level, looking up to gain strength. While Hashem relates to the Jewish people from the lowest to high, bringing the Jewish people up to Him.

That is why Hashem instructs Moshe to start with the doorposts and then the lintel, for Hashem to show that His glory starts from where the Jewish People are and rises up to Him. The righteous add power and heroism   to the heights.

Likewise, in respect to Hashem, Moshe precedes the lintel to the doorposts, to show that for us the glory comes down to us from above.

Vayachi - The Challenge of this World

The parshah opens with:
And Jacob lived in the land of Egypt for seventeen years, and Jacob's days, the years of his life, were a hundred and forty seven years.
Breisheit 47:28
Asks the Netivot Shalom, why does the verse have to specify that Jacob lived in the land of Egypt for 17 years, and then state his age? The number of years he spent in Egypt could be deduced based on the age we learned earlier from when he arrived in Egypt.

Descending into Egypt
To consider this question, the Netivot Shalom raises another issue. Why did Yaacov have to go down to Egypt at all? We see that different patriarchs and matriarchs go down to Egypt. Avraham and Sarah go to Egypt. Yoseph spent most of his life in Egypt. Then Yaacov came down to Egypt.

This plays a key role in paving the way for the People of Israel to eventually to come down to Egypt. Their holy presence in Egypt is meant to transmit holy sparks and infuse the atmosphere of Egypt with a holiness that was not previously present. This is meant to create the foundations for an environment to enable the People of Israel to survive their time in Egypt.

The Power of 17
Yet this doesn't address the main question. Why does the Torah have to stipulate that Yaacov was in Egypt for 17 years?  The Netivot Shalom continues and says that this figure is critical. The gematria of 17 is:
ט ו ב
2 + 6 + 9 = 17

What is this? This is good (טוב). Good is the act of conquering (or correcting) a certain character trait. Good is the opposite of Bad (רע), and of the course the component that is the evil force confronting us is the Yetzer HaRah (יצר הרע).

Why Egypt?
Yet, the Netivot Shalom explains, in order to understand this perspective, we need to understand why the People of Israel went down to Egypt.

In the covenant between Avraham and G-d, there is a warning that Avraham's descendents will suffer. However the exact place is not specified.
And He said to Abram, "You shall surely know that your seed will be strangers in a land that is not theirs, and they will enslave them and oppress them, for four hundred years.
Breisheit 15:13
The land is not specified. So now that we see in fact that the land alluded to will be Egypt. Then why Egypt? What is unique about Egypt to qualify it as this land?

Egypt is the epitome of impurity. It is a place filled with abominations. This is the worst place that the Jewish people could be sent. Since this is the case, the patriarchs and matriarchs needed to lessen the intensity of this impure environment, and infuse it with some level of holiness.

The Morale of the Descent to Egypt
Yaacov going down to Egypt can be seen as a metaphor for the life experience. Yaacov sitting in the promised land, is that place on high where souls are hewn. Then the soul comes down, into this world. Our world is imperfect, and filled with destructive, elements. So like the patriarchs and matriarchs raising up the sparks in Egypt and adding some holiness. We need to work on our souls in the same way in this world